Child online safety education (2024)

research-article

Authors: Truong Pham, Daisaku Goto, and Duc Tran

Published: 09 July 2024 Publication History

  • 0citation
  • 0
  • Downloads

Metrics

Total Citations0Total Downloads0

Last 12 Months0

Last 6 weeks0

  • Get Citation Alerts

    New Citation Alert added!

    This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:

    You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.

    To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.

    Manage my Alerts

    New Citation Alert!

    Please log in to your account

      • View Options
      • References
      • Media
      • Tables
      • Share

    Abstract

    With the rapid expansion of internet accessibility, children urgently need to be educated in online safety skills. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 1399 students from 22 junior high schools in Vietnam to assess the impact of an online safety program on their online behaviors. We designed our experiment to capture both the direct and spillover effects of the training program. We combined the RCT with list experiments, an indirect questioning method, to mitigate bias in the measurement of sensitive outcomes. Our impact estimates show the positive effects of the program. Specifically, participation in the program reduced students' identity disclosure on social networking sites (SNSs) by 9.3–16.8 percentage points, increased their online account security practices by 8.9–17.9 percentage points, and decreased their interactions with strangers online by 13.6–23.4 percentage points. Notably, using outcomes measured by the list experiments, we show that the program reduced sensitive and risky online behaviors by 34.7–47.0 percentage points, a result that would not have been revealed with conventional direct questioning. We also observed evidence of spillover effects on nonparticipants in the same schools. Our findings support the implementation of educational programs to enhance children's online safety.

    Highlights

    We conducted a RCT to evaluate the impact of an online safety program on children.

    The study combines list experiments to mitigate social desirability biases.

    The online safety program mitigates risky online behaviors among children.

    List experiments reveal a reduction in sensitive behaviors of 34.7–47.0 percentage points.

    We observe evidence of positive spillover effects on nonparticipants.

    References

    [1]

    S. Ahmad, R. Lensink, A. Mueller, Religion, social desirability bias and financial inclusion: Evidence from a list experiment on Islamic (micro-)finance, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 38 (100795) (2023),.

    [2]

    J. Alemany, E. Del Val, J. Alberola, A. García-Fornes, Enhancing the privacy risk awareness of teenagers in online social networks through soft-paternalism mechanisms, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 129 (2019) 27–40,.

    Digital Library

    [3]

    J.C. Andrews, K.L. Walker, J. Kees, Children and online privacy protection: Empowerment from cognitive defense strategies, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 39 (2) (2020) 205–219,.

    [4]

    G. Blair, K. Imai, Statistical analysis of list experiments, Political Analysis 20 (1) (2012) 47–77,.

    [5]

    R.L. Collins, V.C. Strasburger, J.D. Brown, E. Donnerstein, A. Lenhart, L.M. Ward, Sexual media and childhood well-being and health, Pediatrics 140 (Supplement_2) (2017) S162–S166,.

    [6]

    L. Desimpelaere, L. Hudders, D. Van De Sompel, Knowledge as a strategy for privacy protection: How a privacy literacy training affects children's online disclosure behavior, Computers in Human Behavior 110 (106382) (2020),.

    [7]

    S. Edwards, A. Nolan, M. Henderson, A. Mantilla, L. Plowman, H. Skouteris, Young children's everyday concepts of the internet: A platform for cyber-safety education in the early years: Young children's everyday concepts about the internet, British Journal of Educational Technology 49 (1) (2018) 45–55,.

    [8]

    A. El-Asam, A. Katz, C. Street, N.M. Nazar, M. Livanou, Children's services for the digital age: A qualitative study into current procedures and online risks among service users, Children and Youth Services Review 122 (105872) (2021),.

    [9]

    Y. Feng, W. Xie, Teens' concern for privacy when using social networking sites: An analysis of socialization agents and relationships with privacy-protecting behaviors, Computers in Human Behavior 33 (2014) 153–162,.

    Digital Library

    [10]

    D. Finkelhor, K. Walsh, L. Jones, K. Mitchell, A. Collier, Youth internet safety education: Aligning programs with the evidence base, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 22 (5) (2021) 1233–1247,.

    [11]

    General Statistics Office (2020): Completed results of the 2019 Vietnam population and housing census. Statistical publishing house. http://tongdieutradanso.vn/12-completed-results-of-the-2019-census.html.

    [12]

    U. Hasebrink, S.M. Livingstone, V. Donoso, B. Lobe, Comparing children's online opportunities and risks across europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU Kids online : [European research on cultural, contextual and risk issues in children's safe use of the internet and new media (2006-2009)], in: L. Haddon (Ed.), EU Kids online, 2008.

    [13]

    B. Hayes, A. James, R. Barn, D. Watling, Children's risk and benefit behaviours on social networking sites, Computers in Human Behavior 130 (107147) (2022),.

    Digital Library

    [14]

    B. Hofstra, R. Corten, F. Van Tubergen, Understanding the privacy behavior of adolescents on Facebook: The role of peers, popularity and trust, Computers in Human Behavior 60 (2016) 611–621,.

    Digital Library

    [15]

    L.B. Hurwitz, K.L. Schmitt, Can children benefit from early internet exposure? Short- and long-term links between internet use, digital skill, and academic performance, Computers & Education 146 (2020),.

    Digital Library

    [16]

    K. Imai, Quantitative social science: An introduction, Princeton University Press, 2018, https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691167039/quantitative-social-science.

    [17]

    ITU, Measuring digital development facts and Figures 2022, ITUPublications, 2022, https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2022/.

    [18]

    ITU (2023): Population of global offline continues steady decline to 2.6 billion people in 2023. ITU. https://www.itu.int:443/en/mediacentre/Pages/PR-2023-09-12-universal-and-meaningful-connectivity-by-2030.aspx.

    [19]

    G. Koletić, Longitudinal associations between the use of sexually explicit material and adolescents' attitudes and behaviors: A narrative review of studies, Journal of Adolescence 57 (1) (2017) 119–133,.

    [20]

    I. Kwan, K. Dickson, M. Richardson, W. MacDowall, H. Burchett, C. Stansfield, G. Brunton, K. Sutcliffe, J. Thomas, Cyberbullying and children and young people's mental health: A systematic map of systematic reviews, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 23 (2) (2020) 72–82,.

    [21]

    F. Lazarinis, K. Alexandri, C. Panagiotakopoulos, V.S. Verykios, Sensitizing young children on internet addiction and online safety risks through storytelling in a mobile application, Education and Information Technologies 25 (1) (2020) 163–174,.

    Digital Library

    [22]

    A.K. Liau, Y. Park, D.A. Gentile, D.P. Katna, C.H.A. Tan, A. Khoo, iZ HERO adventure: Evaluating the effectiveness of a peer-mentoring and transmedia cyberwellness program for children, Psychology of Popular Media Culture 6 (4) (2017) 326–337,.

    [23]

    S. Livingstone, E. Helsper, Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: The role of online skills and internet self-efficacy, New Media & Society 12 (2) (2010) 309–329,.

    [24]

    P. Mertala, Young children's perceptions of ubiquitous computing and the Internet of Things, British Journal of Educational Technology 51 (1) (2020) 84–102,.

    [25]

    I. Mulero-Henríquez, R. Pérez-Solís, S. Falcon, Impact of ICT and social networks on students: An analysis of gender-based attitudinal profiles, Education and Information Technologies (2023),.

    Digital Library

    [26]

    S.P. Nicholson, H. Huang, Making the list: Reevaluating political trust and social desirability in China, American Political Science Review 117 (3) (2023) 1158–1165,.

    [27]

    D.L. Paulhus, Two-component models of socially desirable responding, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (3) (1984) 598–609,.

    [28]

    B. Rosenfeld, K. Imai, J.N. Shapiro, An empirical validation study of popular survey methodologies for sensitive questions, American Journal of Political Science 60 (3) (2016) 783–802,.

    [29]

    D.B. Rubin, Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies, Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (5) (1974) 688–701,.

    [30]

    B. Sinclair, M. McConnell, D.P. Green, Detecting spillover effects: Design and analysis of multilevel experiments, American Journal of Political Science 56 (4) (2012) 1055–1069,.

    [31]

    P.C.-H. Soh, K.W. Chew, K.Y. Koay, P.H. Ang, Parents vs peers' influence on teenagers' Internet addiction and risky online activities, Telematics and Informatics 35 (1) (2018) 225–236,.

    [32]

    N. Steinfeld, Parental mediation of adolescent Internet use: Combining strategies to promote awareness, autonomy and self-regulation in preparing youth for life on the web, Education and Information Technologies 26 (2) (2021) 1897–1920,.

    Digital Library

    [33]

    United Nations, Achieving universal connectivity by 2030, United Nations, 2023, https://www.un.org/techenvoy/content/global-connectivity.

    [34]

    C. Yu, A.E. Kågesten, S. De Meyer, C. Moreau, M. Van Reeuwijk, C. Lou, p*rnography use and perceived gender norms among young adolescents in urban poor environments: A cross-site study, Journal of Adolescent Health 69 (1) (2021) S31–S38,.

    Recommendations

    • Profiles of Internet use and parental involvement, and rates of online risks and problematic Internet use among Spanish adolescents

      This study aimed to empirically identify the major adolescent Internet user profiles in Spanish secondary students based on self-reported pattern of use, level of parental control and parent-child conflict around use, and to characterize their ...

      Read More

    • ‘Just-in-Time’ Parenting: A Two-Month Examination of the Bi-directional Influences Between Parental Mediation and Adolescent Online Risk Exposure

      HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust

      Abstract

      Parental mediation is a key factor that influences adolescents’ exposure to online risk. Yet, research on this topic has mostly been cross-sectional and correlative, not exploring whether the relationship between parental mediation and adolescent ...

      Read More

    • Examining the Unique Online Risk Experiences and Mental Health Outcomes of LGBTQ+ versus Heterosexual Youth

      CHI '24: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

      We collected and analyzed Instagram direct messages (DMs) from 173 youth aged 13–21 (including 86 LGBTQ+ youth). We examined youth’s risk-flagged social media trace data with their self-reported mental health outcomes to examine how the differing online ...

      Read More

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Child online safety education (1)

    Computers in Human Behavior Volume 156, Issue C

    Jul 2024

    447 pages

    ISSN:0747-5632

    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Elsevier Ltd.

    Publisher

    Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

    Netherlands

    Publication History

    Published: 09 July 2024

    Author Tags

    1. Online risks
    2. Risky online behaviors
    3. Online safety education
    4. Randomized controlled trials
    5. List experiments
    6. Spillover effects

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Child online safety education (2)

    Other Metrics

    View Article Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Total Citations

    • Total Downloads

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    View Author Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    Get this Publication

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Child online safety education (2024)

    FAQs

    What are the 3 areas of risk for children online? ›

    Understanding the risks to children

    Areas for online risks can be categorised into the 3 C's - Content, Contact and Conduct, and can be commercial, aggressive or sexual in nature as shown in the table below.

    What are the 4 C's that present a risk to children when they go online? ›

    An important step in improving online safety at your school is identifying what the potential risks might be. KCSIE groups online safety risks into four areas: content, contact, conduct and commerce (sometimes referred to as contract). These are known as the 4 Cs of online safety.

    What are the 3 C's of online safety? ›

    If you receive regular online safety training you will (or should) be acquainted with the 3C's which are content, contact and conduct. These are by far the easiest way of understanding the vast range of online risks and issues.

    What is online safety answer? ›

    Online Safety is being aware of the nature of the possible threats that you could encounter whilst engaging in activity through the Internet. These could be security threats, protecting and managing your personal data, online reputation management, and avoiding harmful or illegal content.

    What are the Internet safety rules for kids? ›

    Never reveal personal information, such as address, phone number, or school name or location. Use only a screen name and don't share passwords (other than with parents). Never agree to get together in person with anyone met online without parent approval and/or supervision.

    What are the 4 R's of online safety? ›

    ' Let us start by helping our kids develop four critical skills – the 4Rs of online safety: Respect– I treat myself and others the way I like to be treated. Responsibility – I am accountable for my actions and I take a stand when I feel something is wrong. Reasoning – I question what is real.

    What is the minimum age for social media? ›

    Most of the popular social media services require users to be at least 13 years of age before they can register, although some sites are created especially for children under 13 (see Internet Matters' Social networks made for children). The age requirements are there because of data protection laws.

    Which group of children are more susceptible to online dangers and risks? ›

    Children in communities with a limited understanding of different forms of sexual abuse and exploitation of children. Children who are out of school. Children with disabilities. Children who suffer from depression or mental health problems.

    How can a teacher ensure a student's safety while they are online? ›

    Create strong passwords.

    Having a different password for each account is also important. Remind students not to share passwords with friends. Show students some different passwords, and ask them to evaluate whether or not they are secure. Helping them to understand how to create a strong password is important.

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

    Last Updated:

    Views: 5873

    Rating: 5 / 5 (50 voted)

    Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

    Birthday: 2000-07-07

    Address: 5050 Breitenberg Knoll, New Robert, MI 45409

    Phone: +2556892639372

    Job: Investor Mining Engineer

    Hobby: Sketching, Cosplaying, Glassblowing, Genealogy, Crocheting, Archery, Skateboarding

    Introduction: My name is The Hon. Margery Christiansen, I am a bright, adorable, precious, inexpensive, gorgeous, comfortable, happy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.